Modeling Colorectal Cancer Using Organoids from Familial APC
Source Drost et al. · Hubrecht Institute and University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands · 10.1126/science.aao3130
Abstract
Used organoids from familial adenomatous polyposis patients to demonstrate that APC-heterozygous normal intestinal epithelium accumulates mutations at an accelerated rate compared to wild-type tissue. Whole-genome sequencing revealed distinct mutational signatures active during early tumorigenesis.
Protocol overview
25 steps across 6 phases
- 1 Design and Prepare CRISPR Components
- 2 Transfect Organoids with CRISPR-Cas9 and Selection Cassette
- 3 Puromycin Selection
- 4 Clonal Expansion and Single Organoid Isolation
- 5 Genotyping by PCR and Sequencing
- 6 Verify Gene Inactivation by qRT-PCR
- 7 Confirm Protein Loss by Western Blot
- 8 Passage Knockout and Parental Organoids
- 9 Generate Subclonal Cultures via Flow Cytometry
- 10 Expand Subclonal Organoids
- 11 Isolate Genomic DNA
- 12 Perform Whole-Genome Sequencing (WGS)
- 13 Align Sequencing Reads and Call Variants
- 14 Filter and Annotate Mutations
- 15 Calculate Mutation Accumulation Rates
- 16 Extract Mutational Spectra
- 17 Compare to COSMIC Signatures
- 18 Analyze Indel Patterns
- 19 Perform Replication Timing Analysis (Repli-seq)
- 20 Determine Replication Origin Locations
- 21 Correlate Mutations with Replication Timing
- 22 Analyze Replication Strand Asymmetry
- 23 Obtain Clinical Cancer Sequencing Data
- 24 Perform Cosine Similarity Analysis on Clinical Samples
- 25 Screen for Germline Mutations in Candidate Genes
Full SOP
Create a free account to access this protocol
Join OrganMatch to unlock step-by-step procedures, reagent concentrations, QC checklists, and downloadable batch record templates.
Create free accountAlready registered? Log in
Attribution
This SOP was authored by Organthis based on the published method in Drost et al.. The originating laboratory holds no rights in this SOP and has not endorsed it unless marked Verified.
This wording is awaiting legal review.
Something wrong with this entry? Report an issue with this protocol